Skip to main content

Best Practices

This guide consolidates best practices for effectively managing and participating in performance review campaigns.


For HR Administrators

Campaign Design

Timeline Planning

RECOMMENDED DURATIONS BY CAMPAIGN TYPE

Annual Performance Review:
├── Self-Evaluation: 14-21 days
├── Reviewer Evaluation: 14-21 days
├── Interview Phase: 7-14 days
└── Total Duration: 6-8 weeks

Quarterly Check-in:
├── Self-Evaluation: 7-10 days
├── Reviewer Evaluation: 7-10 days
├── Interview Phase: 3-5 days
└── Total Duration: 3-4 weeks

360° Feedback:
├── Self-Evaluation: 7-10 days
├── Multiple Reviewers: 14-21 days
├── Interview Phase: 7 days
└── Total Duration: 4-6 weeks

Buffer Time

INCLUDE BUFFERS FOR:

├── Holidays and company events
├── Month/quarter end busy periods
├── Vacation seasons
├── Project deadlines
└── Unexpected delays

RECOMMENDATION:
├── Add 3-5 days buffer per phase
├── End campaign before fiscal deadlines
├── Avoid launching during major events
└── Consider time zone differences

Form Design

Question Balance

OPTIMAL FORM STRUCTURE

Total Questions: 15-25 (avoid >30)
├── Rating questions: 40% (quick to answer)
├── Text questions: 30% (meaningful feedback)
├── Objective questions: 20% (goal tracking)
└── Skills questions: 10% (competency mapping)

Section Count: 4-6 sections
├── Too few: Sections become overwhelming
├── Too many: Navigation becomes tedious
└── Sweet spot: 3-5 questions per section

Question Wording

DO:
├── Use clear, concise language
├── Be specific about what you're asking
├── Provide context when needed
├── Use consistent terminology
└── Make rating scales clear

DON'T:
├── Ask multiple things in one question
├── Use jargon or acronyms without explanation
├── Make questions too long (>2 sentences)
├── Use leading or biased wording
└── Assume knowledge of previous reviews

Rating Scales

RECOMMENDED SCALES

5-Point Scale (Most Common):
├── 5: Far Exceeds Expectations
├── 4: Exceeds Expectations
├── 3: Meets Expectations
├── 2: Needs Improvement
└── 1: Below Expectations

Benefits:
├── Familiar to most users
├── Clear differentiation
├── Allows for nuance
└── Statistical analysis friendly

AVOID:
├── 10-point scales (too granular)
├── 3-point scales (not enough nuance)
├── Inconsistent scales across questions
└── Missing "Not Applicable" option when needed

Participant Management

Evaluator Assignment

ASSIGNMENT BEST PRACTICES

Primary Rule: Direct manager as evaluator
├── Best insight into day-to-day performance
├── Ongoing relationship for feedback
├── Accountability for development
└── Natural follow-up in 1:1s

Exceptions:
├── New manager (less than 3 months): Consider previous manager
├── Matrix organizations: Include dotted-line manager as 2nd reviewer
├── Project-based work: Add project lead perspective
└── Senior roles: Consider skip-level input

Workload Balance

EVALUATOR WORKLOAD LIMITS

Recommended Maximum: 8-10 reviews per evaluator
├── Allows thoughtful evaluation
├── Prevents burnout
├── Maintains quality
└── Respects time constraints

If Exceeded:
├── Split across multiple campaigns
├── Add secondary evaluators
├── Extend timeline
└── Provide additional support

Communication

Pre-Campaign Communication

SEND 1-2 WEEKS BEFORE:

Subject: Upcoming Performance Review: [Campaign Name]

Include:
├── Campaign timeline and deadlines
├── What to expect (process overview)
├── How to access the review
├── Preparation tips
├── Who to contact with questions
└── Link to resources/FAQ

Audience: All participants (employees and evaluators)

During Campaign

REMINDER SCHEDULE

Self-Evaluation Phase:
├── Day 3: First reminder to non-starters
├── Day 7: Progress check (halfway)
├── Day 12: Deadline warning (2 days before)
└── Day 14: Final deadline reminder

Reviewer Phase:
├── Same schedule as self-evaluation
├── Include list of pending reviews
└── Highlight any ready for interview

Interview Phase:
├── Reminder to schedule meetings
├── Approaching deadline notice
└── Completion confirmation

Monitoring

Daily Checks

DAILY MONITORING CHECKLIST

□ Review alert dashboard
□ Check for stalled reviews (>5 days no activity)
□ Identify overdue participants
□ Review completion rate trend
□ Address any escalated issues
□ Send targeted reminders

Intervention Triggers

WHEN TO INTERVENE

1-3 Days Overdue:
├── Automated reminder sufficient
├── Monitor for response
└── No manual action yet

4-7 Days Overdue:
├── Personal follow-up email
├── Check for blockers
├── Offer support/resources
└── CC manager if employee

8+ Days Overdue:
├── Direct conversation
├── Escalate to HR/leadership
├── Consider deadline extension
└── Document reasons

For Managers

Preparation

Before Campaign Starts

MANAGER PREPARATION CHECKLIST

□ Review team roster for accuracy
□ Confirm you're assigned as evaluator for all reports
□ Block calendar time for evaluations
□ Gather performance notes from the period
□ Review previous reviews for context
□ Collect any peer feedback available
□ Understand rating calibration guidelines

During Self-Evaluation Phase

WHILE WAITING FOR SELF-EVALS:

□ Prepare draft assessment notes
□ Review team objectives and results
□ Collect relevant metrics and data
□ Note specific examples for feedback
□ Plan development recommendations
□ Consider career discussion points

Writing Evaluations

Feedback Quality

THE SBI MODEL

Situation: Describe the context
├── When did this happen?
├── What was the project/task?
└── Who was involved?

Behavior: Describe what the person did
├── What specific actions?
├── Observable behaviors only
└── No assumptions about intent

Impact: Describe the result
├── What was the outcome?
├── How did it affect the team/company?
└── Why does it matter?

EXAMPLE:
"During the Q3 product launch (Situation), Alice identified
a critical security vulnerability two days before release
and worked overtime to fix it (Behavior). This prevented
potential customer data exposure and saved an estimated
$50K in remediation costs (Impact)."

Rating Consistency

RATING CALIBRATION

Before Rating:
├── Review calibration guidelines
├── Understand what each level means
├── Consider full review period, not just recent events
├── Compare against role expectations, not other employees
└── Avoid common biases

Common Biases to Avoid:
├── Recency bias (overweighting recent events)
├── Halo effect (one trait influencing all ratings)
├── Leniency (avoiding difficult conversations)
├── Central tendency (rating everyone as "meets")
└── Similarity bias (favoring similar personalities)

Development Focus

CONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT FEEDBACK

Structure:
├── Acknowledge current strengths
├── Identify 1-2 growth areas (not everything)
├── Provide specific improvement suggestions
├── Offer support and resources
└── Connect to career aspirations

Example:
"Alice excels at technical problem-solving. To grow into
a senior role, focusing on cross-team communication would
be valuable. I suggest joining the architecture review
board to practice presenting technical decisions to
broader audiences. I can connect you with the chair."

Conducting Interviews

Meeting Preparation

INTERVIEW PREPARATION CHECKLIST

□ Review both evaluations side-by-side
□ Identify key alignment and differences
□ Prepare specific talking points for differences
□ Plan positive opening
□ Prepare development discussion
□ Reserve private meeting space
□ Block 45-60 minutes minimum
□ Have resources ready for development suggestions

Meeting Structure

RECOMMENDED INTERVIEW FLOW (45-60 min)

1. Opening (5 min)
├── Set collaborative tone
├── Thank for completing self-eval
└── Outline agenda

2. Achievements Discussion (10-15 min)
├── Celebrate successes together
├── Discuss aligned ratings
└── Acknowledge contributions

3. Growth Areas (15-20 min)
├── Discuss differences constructively
├── Listen to employee perspective
├── Align on development priorities
└── Identify support needed

4. Future Objectives (10-15 min)
├── Review proposed goals
├── Adjust as needed
├── Set clear expectations
└── Align on success criteria

5. Wrap-up (5 min)
├── Summarize key agreements
├── Confirm next steps
├── Schedule follow-up
└── Complete signatures

Handling Difficult Conversations

WHEN RATINGS DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY

DO:
├── Acknowledge their perspective first
├── Ask questions to understand their view
├── Share your perspective with examples
├── Focus on behaviors, not personality
├── Find areas of agreement
├── Document the conversation
└── Agree on path forward

DON'T:
├── Become defensive
├── Dismiss their concerns
├── Make it personal
├── Avoid the conversation
├── Change ratings just to avoid conflict
└── Leave unresolved

For Employees

Self-Evaluation

Preparation

BEFORE STARTING SELF-EVALUATION

□ Review objectives set at period start
□ Gather data on accomplishments
□ Collect positive feedback received
□ Note challenges overcome
□ List skills developed
□ Reflect on growth areas
□ Think about future goals
□ Block focused time to complete

Writing Quality Responses

EFFECTIVE SELF-ASSESSMENT TIPS

Be Specific:
├── Use data and metrics
├── Include dates and details
├── Name projects and outcomes
└── Quantify when possible

Be Balanced:
├── Highlight achievements confidently
├── Acknowledge challenges honestly
├── Show self-awareness
└── Demonstrate growth mindset

Be Forward-Looking:
├── Connect past to future
├── Show career intentionality
├── Propose development ideas
└── Express aspirations appropriately

Common Mistakes to Avoid

DON'T:

├── Undersell your achievements
│ └── Others may not know what you did
├── Only list recent accomplishments
│ └── Cover the full review period
├── Be vague ("I did a good job")
│ └── Provide specific examples
├── Ignore growth areas
│ └── Shows lack of self-awareness
├── Rush through questions
│ └── This is your opportunity to shine
└── Wait until the last minute
└── Quality suffers under pressure

Interview Participation

Before the Meeting

EMPLOYEE INTERVIEW PREPARATION

□ Review your submitted self-evaluation
□ Anticipate discussion points
□ Prepare questions for your manager
□ Think about career goals
□ Be ready to discuss growth areas
□ Gather examples for any points you want to make
□ Come with open mindset

During the Meeting

EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION

Listen Actively:
├── Hear feedback without interrupting
├── Ask clarifying questions
├── Take notes on key points
└── Show you value their perspective

Engage Constructively:
├── Share your perspective when appropriate
├── Ask for specific examples
├── Request resources for development
└── Propose solutions to challenges

Be Professional:
├── Stay calm if feedback is difficult
├── Avoid defensiveness
├── Focus on growth, not blame
└── Maintain positive relationship

After the Meeting

POST-INTERVIEW ACTIONS

□ Complete signature process
□ Download PDF for records
□ Review development areas agreed
□ Create action plan for goals
□ Schedule follow-up meetings
□ Thank manager for feedback
□ Begin implementing improvements

Campaign Success Metrics

What to Measure

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Completion Metrics:
├── On-time completion rate (target: >90%)
├── Total completion rate (target: >95%)
├── Average days to complete by phase
└── Extension requests count

Quality Metrics:
├── Average response length (text questions)
├── Form completion thoroughness
├── Comment quality (spot check)
└── Objective setting completeness

Engagement Metrics:
├── First-day start rate
├── Interview meeting scheduling rate
├── Signature completion rate
└── PDF download rate

Process Metrics:
├── Reminder emails sent
├── Escalations required
├── Support requests received
└── System issues reported

Continuous Improvement

AFTER EACH CAMPAIGN

Collect Feedback:
├── Survey participants
├── Review HR support tickets
├── Analyze completion patterns
├── Note common questions

Analyze Results:
├── Compare to previous campaigns
├── Identify improvement areas
├── Document what worked well
└── Note what caused delays

Improve Next Cycle:
├── Adjust form based on feedback
├── Refine communication templates
├── Update training materials
├── Adjust timelines if needed
└── Share learnings with stakeholders

Summary: Top 10 Best Practices

#PracticeStakeholder
1Plan realistic timelines with buffersHR Admin
2Design balanced forms (15-25 questions)HR Admin
3Limit evaluator workload (8-10 reviews max)HR Admin
4Send clear, timely communicationsHR Admin
5Prepare with specific examples (SBI model)Managers
6Conduct structured interview meetingsManagers
7Gather data and be specificEmployees
8Participate actively in interviewsEmployees
9Follow up on development commitmentsAll
10Continuously improve the processHR Admin